Empirical Study of Security Concerns in OpenClaw Agentic Systems
OpenClaw
Researchers presented an empirical study analyzing security concerns and prompt injection vulnerabilities in OpenClaw agentic AI systems. The work utilizes data from Reddit and security-tagged GitHub issues to evaluate risks arising from untrusted inputs and tool execution.
why this severityResearch paper demonstrating security risks and attacks without known active real-world exploitation.
- affected
- OpenClaw
- first report
- 27 Oct 2026
- last update
- 27 Oct 2026
Timeline · 1
Sources · 1
Research and catalogues
- 2026-10-27Then there is prompt injection, a malicious email, ...: The Wild Wide West of OpenClaw Agentic System SecurityarXiv · arxiv.org/abs/2610.35451
Titles and links belong to their publishers. The summary above is written by gcdRadar in its own words; data is CC BY-SA 4.0.
Classification
- lane
- Research
- AI role
- Attack on AI
- categories
- Prompt injectionAgent hijack
- severity
- 1 · Research / proof of concept
- targets
- Open-weight model
- owasp llm top 10
- LLM01:2025 Prompt InjectionLLM06:2025 Excessive Agency
- dates
- happened 27 Oct 2026 · first reported 27 Oct 2026
- origin
- News & research feeds
- record
- confidence 0.90 · created 2026-10-27 09:09Z · updated 2026-11-11 00:12Z
Lane, AI role, categories and severity come from the classifier; the OWASP and ATLAS rows are derived from the categories. How these are assigned
Copy a brief
This record as a short Markdown brief, for a ticket, a chat or a coding agent.
the brief as text
# Empirical Study of Security Concerns in OpenClaw Agentic Systems https://gcdradar.vercel.app/incidents/empirical-study-of-security-concerns-in-openclaw-agentic-sys · AIR-2026-1558 · closed 2026-11-10 - Lane: Research - Severity: 1 (Research / proof of concept): Research paper demonstrating security risks and attacks without known active real-world exploitation. - Fix status: Fix status unknown - First reported: 2026-10-27 - AI role: Attack on AI - Products: OpenClaw ## Summary Researchers presented an empirical study analyzing security concerns and prompt injection vulnerabilities in OpenClaw agentic AI systems. The work utilizes data from Reddit and security-tagged GitHub issues to evaluate risks arising from untrusted inputs and tool execution. ## What to do No action recorded; read the sources below and the vendor's advisory. ## Affected and fixed versions - Affected: OpenClaw ## Latest updates - 2026-10-27: Then there is prompt injection, a malicious email, ...: The Wild Wide West of OpenClaw Agentic System Security (https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35451) ## Sources - 2026-10-27 arXiv: Then there is prompt injection, a malicious email, ...: The Wild Wide West of OpenClaw Agentic System Security https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35451 Verify against the vendor's advisory before changing production. Data CC BY-SA 4.0, https://gcdradar.vercel.app.
Related
- closedOpenClaw Scope-Gap Injection: Exploiting Evaluator Blind Spots in OpenClaw
Research · since 27 Oct 2026
AI - closedOpenClaw AutoRedClaw: Automated Red-Teaming for Persistent Claw-Style Agents
Research · since 21 Oct 2026
AI - liveCapLite: Evaluating Prompt-Injection Vulnerabilities in Small Language Models
Research · since 13 Nov 2026
AI - liveGemini Adaptive Prompt Injection Attacks Scaled Using Agent Swarms
Research · since 10 Nov 2026
AI - liveGLM-5.3 I Think, Therefore I Attack: Evaluating Thought Injection Attacks on Reasoning Agents
Research · since 9 Nov 2026
AI - liveBeyond Instruction Override: Benchmarking Indirect Prompt Injection
Research · since 6 Nov 2026
AI